Q107 Classic Rock - Jason Ward's Blog

search q107.com

DJs & Shows

Share This Page

Aerosmith - Should they or shouldn't they?

Posted 11/7/2009 12:00:00 PM

It seems that things in Camp Aerosmith aren't so good these days.

Singer Steven Tyler recently admitted to Classic Rock magazine that he'd be spending all of 2010 focusing on solo projects.

"I don’t know what I’m doing yet, but it’s definitely going to be something Steven Tyler: working on the brand of myself – Brand Tyler," said the 61-year-old singer.

In addition, the magazine claimed there was off-stage friction between Tyler and the rest of Aerosmith at their recent show at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix. The vocalist's dressing room was allegedly located at a great distance from the rest of the band and that no one saw him until the band had to hit the stage.

Funny thing is, it's not surprising.

Back in August when Aerosmith guitarist Joe Perry visited The Kim Mitchell Show on Q107 following Tyler's injury, Perry let it slip that much of Aerosmith doesn't have access to its lead singer. After falling from a stage in South Dakota (click here to see the video), Tyler's people took care of him and many of the band members didn't even know how the singer was doing.

That's not how a band should work.

Rumour has it that Aerosmith will be meeting over the next few weeks without Steven Tyler to discuss the possibility of a future where the other member of the Toxic Twins isn't around.

Question is, should they?

Should Aerosmith continue on with a new lead singer or should the band call it quits?

Jason Ward is a Toronto-based writer and on-air host on Classic Rock Q107, heard on Q Saturday Afternoons from 12 to 6 and Psychedelic Psunday Evenings from 6 to 9. WTF?! with Jason Ward is updated every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday.

Posted By: Jason Ward

Comments:

I love Aerosmith. Seen them many times in concert. But what makes me love the music is the collaberation of all the present members of the band. I think that the very unique style of Steven Tyler is a huge part of that. The music would just not have the same sound and most likely the same appeal. I don't know if I would go to a show without tyler on vocals.
Posted By d.donaldson On 11/11/2009 5:06:29 AM

Aerosmith's day has past. They haven't been relevant for years. The last ground breaking sound they had was the collaboration with Run DMC!!! Time to pack it in, boys, the Rolling Stones you aren't.
Posted By Dave Williams On 11/10/2009 9:12:23 AM

Pack it in boys - long overdue
Posted By Dan D On 11/10/2009 8:56:29 AM

If Steven leaves Aerosmith then the band should definItely call it quits! Aerosmith is not Aerosmith without Steven Tyler!
Posted By Diane On 11/10/2009 12:49:14 AM

Though a huge fan of Aerosmith, I say it's time to throw in the towel, enjoy the retirement and take up less vigorous pursuits -- like professional stage-diving!
Posted By Mike On 11/9/2009 3:26:16 PM

Over Sixty , not the original members.Time to call it quits. In the real world it's called retiring.
Posted By James Brown On 11/9/2009 12:38:14 PM

He will be back for the Geritol Tour.
Posted By Dan Foster On 11/9/2009 8:43:02 AM

This band had these kinds of problems before...maybe it's time to call it quits!
Posted By Kelli On 11/8/2009 11:26:46 PM

I agree with Pete; Aerosmith would just NOT be the same without Steven. Rumour has it that Steven has fallen off the wagon (again!) and that this has caused a lot of the issues they currently face. For Steven's sake (and the band's) I certainly hope this is not the case.....only time will tell!
Posted By Pearl On 11/8/2009 10:08:17 PM

Its just not Aerosmith without Steve, just like the Stones without Mick or Zeppelin without Plant. You gotta know when to quit when your on top.
Posted By Pete On 11/8/2009 7:24:44 PM

Why are getting a new singer and calling it quits the only options? How about let Steven do his own thing for a bit. Constantly touring with one of the biggest bands in the world must get a little stressful and he just needs some time alone. I'm sure this isn't the end of Aerosmith.
Posted By LesClaypool On 11/8/2009 2:25:47 AM

Bands like Aerosmith,the Stones,the Who etc. etc. are totally embarassing. Who wants to see a SIXTY YEAR OLD???? Pink Floyd could pull it off because they didn't try and jump around like 20 rock stars. These bands have looked stupid for years and have sadly made their once great music just sad and pathetic. Most haven't made a good album in 25 years and they should realize it.
Posted By Jeff M in Guelph On 11/7/2009 11:23:12 PM

Well, if we needed any further proof that Tyler is high again, there it is. Why not go on without him? Tyler et al continued without Perry back in the day. I nominate Ian Astbury...or go another way with Robert Cray. I can't see him doing Love In An Elevator--which is a good thing.
Posted By dawn On 11/7/2009 10:39:33 PM

Ole 'Jam-Pail Mouth" is having one of his hissy fits again! Give him some cooling-off time & then gas him for a new lead. I think he's back on the schnay & booze again, so it could be a while? Too bad!
Posted By Rick/Rude On 11/7/2009 9:51:10 PM

I am not following this too closely (TABS and paparazzi can blow small things out of proportion) I believe the entire band is going on a hiatus to pursue solo interests. They will be back..
Posted By IG On 11/7/2009 8:20:55 PM

The whole story isn't being told.I suspect we will truly never know.Either way..take a break for a year..maybe talk to the Rolling Stones for some advise :)So..no
Posted By Rockstar On 11/7/2009 2:56:40 PM

I believe, that each member of "Aerosmith" has earned the right to their name! Put it to a vote, or maybe they should put us fans to a vote! I would say, Solo, is F.I.N.E. fine but retire "Aerosmith" first!!!! Remember, its better to burn out, then to fade away! Go out with dignity guys, Life is to short and you are not getting younger!!!!!!! Love to see a farewell concert, first!!! mamakin343 huge Aerosmith fan!!!!!

Posted By Mamakin343 On 11/7/2009 2:23:34 PM